Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Photographers Online...

Naturally, as i usually do i first went back to my favorite band to get the names of their photographers. I've known for a while about Camella Grace-Jones' "SpiralEyes" and the work she does. A lot bizzare shots of nudes in odd compromising positions and body paint, things like that. The biography section puts it best "SpiralEyes refuses to be defined. The absence of obvious themes - feminism, deviance, violence - forces the viewer to feel and think for him or herself. Drawing on moments that impact our lives, their work evokes raw emotion without being sexual. To truly experience human expression from any angle, one must disregard pre-conceptions, reservations and restrictions. Allow yourself to be touched, and you will be moved. Challenge yourself. Challenge your beliefs. Challenge your fears. Get emotionally naked. Become vulnerable,any way you can. Only then are you ready to experience spiraleyes." the site uses mainly flash menu bars and javascript fot the images.

Chris Ross i found through the wonderful tool called GOOGLE. Chris' work mainly involves outdoor photos of fishing trips all over the world and industrial photos his photos are used in advertisements for companies that make surf gear, boat motors and in magazunes. His site uses flash and javasctipt to exhibit his work.

http://www.carreonphotography.com/ uses HTML to exhibit their work. Their list of clients include National Geographic, Dscovery Channel, Forbes and Wells Capital manageme

I've found that most photography websites are based around a main slide show of their work, a list of clientele as well as a contact link. There is not much more to a photo site, i would like to see some sort of interaction on a photography site but in order to be professional that isn't possible.

1 comment:

  1. ask Sarah for a link to this great photo site she found. its all flash but its really fantastic.

    consider that maybe there are no great interactive photography sites bc photographers may typically not be interested in interactivity.

    is it a good enough reason to not try an interactive portfolio merely bc no one else is doing it?

    ReplyDelete